With US tariff revenue rising, will oil prices break lower or rebound on geopolitics?

September 10, 2025
Oil price concept shown by a barrel and magnifying glass with a dollar symbol.

Crude is more likely to break lower toward $60, according to analysts, than rebound on geopolitics. Rising U.S. tariff revenue is cutting the federal deficit, but at the cost of slower global growth and weaker fuel demand. Oil inventories are climbing, and supply from both OPEC+ and non-OPEC producers remains strong. 

While geopolitical risks - from Israel’s strike in Qatar to U.S. tariff and sanction threats on Russian oil - are supporting prices in the short term, fundamentals point to oversupply. That makes a downside test of $60 the dominant risk unless major disruptions tighten the market.

Key takeaways

  • WTI crude is at around $63, with downside risks building toward $60.

  • US tariff revenue surge cuts the federal deficit by $300 billion but slows global growth, dampening oil demand.

  • Israel's strike in Qatar raises Gulf security concerns, injecting a risk premium.

  • Trump pushes new sanctions and tariffs on Russian oil flows, targeting India and China.

  • US inventories rise by 1.25 million barrels, highlighting supply pressure.

  • OPEC+ increases output modestly, but production growth from the US, Brazil, and Guyana remains strong.

Fundamentals point to lower prices

The fundamental picture for oil remains bearish.

Inventories are climbing: API data for the week ending 5 September showed a 1.25 million barrel build in U.S. crude stocks, confirming that supply is running ahead of demand. 

Bar chart showing weekly U.S. crude oil inventory changes from Oct 2024 to Sep 2025.
Source: American Petroleum Institute (API)

In a typical market, this would weigh heavily on prices, and traders are already cautious about further builds. 

Demand growth is weakening: The surge in U.S. tariff revenue - $31.4 billion in August, $183.6 billion year-to-date - is reducing the deficit but slowing global trade. 

Line chart comparing U.S. tariff revenue in 2025 vs 2024, showing a sharp rise in 2025.
Source: US. Department of the Treasury

Reports show retaliation from trading partners has curbed consumer confidence and reduced industrial activity, dragging on fuel use. Global GDP forecasts for 2025 have been revised down by 0.5 percentage points, with U.S. growth also weaker, a trend that directly feeds into lower oil demand.

Supply growth remains robust:

  • OPEC+ announced a smaller-than-expected production hike over the weekend, but it still adds barrels into the market.

  • Non-OPEC producers led by the U.S., Brazil, and Guyana continue to expand output. In the U.S., technology-driven efficiency gains mean record production even with fewer rigs.

  • Taken together, these increases keep the market well supplied despite softening demand.

This dynamic points to WTI testing $60 per barrel, especially if inventories continue to build through September.

Oil market geopolitics risks provide short-term support 

Despite weak fundamentals, geopolitical risks are providing support and preventing a sharper selloff. Israel’s strike in Qatar was a rare and destabilising event. Israel targeted Hamas leadership in Doha on Tuesday, with Hamas reporting five casualties. 

Qatar hosts the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East and has been a key mediator in peace talks. The strike rattled markets, pushing oil up nearly 2% before gains were trimmed after U.S. officials downplayed the likelihood of repeat attacks. Still, the incident has injected a fresh risk premium tied to Gulf instability.

U.S. pressure on Russian oil flows is also in focus. According to Reuters, Trump has pushed for more restrictions on Moscow’s crude exports, calling for 100% tariffs on India and China if they continue buying Russian oil. 

India already faces a 50% tariff. If enforced, these measures could reduce Russian revenues and disrupt flows to key buyers, supporting global oil prices. For now, India and China have resisted Western pressure, but the threat alone is enough to buoy sentiment.

Tariffs and the dollar complicate the picture

The fiscal impact of rising U.S. tariff revenue is clear. Year-to-date collections of $183.6 billion could exceed $300 billion by year-end, trimming the U.S. budget deficit by a similar amount. According to forecasts, this fiscal relief could strengthen the U.S. dollar.

For oil, however, a stronger dollar is a double-edged sword:

  • It makes crude more expensive for buyers outside the U.S., reducing demand.

  • It pressures exporters, who earn less in local currency terms.

Combined with slower global growth from trade tensions, the tariff story weighs more on demand than on supply, reinforcing the bearish case.

Market impact and price scenarios

The balance of risks points to continued volatility.

  • Bearish scenario: Fundamentals dominate. Rising inventories and slowing demand push WTI down to $60, with risks extending into the $50–55 range if surpluses build through 2026.

  • Bullish scenario: Geopolitics flare up. Gulf instability or harsher U.S. sanctions on Russia add a risk premium, supporting crude near $65–70 in the short term.

  • Base case: A push–pull market where WTI trades between $60 and $70, with direction driven by headlines more than fundamentals.

Oil price technical analysis

WTI’s current price near $63 is close to an important support level around $61.40. A break below this zone could accelerate losses toward $60, while a rebound on geopolitical headlines could test $70 and $75 resistance levels. Current trading volumes suggest that sellers remain active, indicating persistent downward pressure unless buyers step in with momentum. 

US Oil daily chart with resistance at 70 & 65.75 and support at 61.40, showing potential consolidation.
Source: Deriv MT5

Investment implications

For traders and investors, the current setup favours short-term tactical trading.

  • Buying near the $61.40 support zone may offer opportunities if geopolitical risks spark temporary rebounds.

  • Selling into rallies near $70–75 aligns with the broader bearish fundamentals and slowing demand.

  • Medium-term positioning should account for rising supply and a weaker demand outlook, with risks skewed toward a prolonged test of the $50–55 range in 2026.

Energy equities tied to efficient U.S. shale and low-cost producers may outperform, while higher-cost offshore projects remain vulnerable. Refiners could continue to benefit from high throughput even if crude prices weaken.

Disclaimer:

The performance figures quoted are not a guarantee of future performance.

FAQs

Why could oil prices fall to $60?

Oil prices risk dropping to $60 because supply is expanding faster than demand. U.S. shale output remains resilient, OPEC+ is gradually adding barrels, and global inventories are building. At the same time, weaker GDP growth in major economies and the drag from tariffs are softening consumption. The mismatch between supply and demand is what creates downward pressure.

What could prevent a drop to $60?

A sudden geopolitical shock could halt or reverse the decline. For example, new or expanded sanctions on Russian crude, instability in the Middle East, or disruptions to shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz could tighten supply. These kinds of risks often trigger price spikes, even when fundamentals suggest softness.

How do tariffs factor into oil markets?

Tariffs have a twofold effect. On one hand, they strengthen the U.S. dollar and reduce the trade deficit, making crude more expensive for buyers using other currencies. On the other hand, they dampen global trade flows, reduce manufacturing activity, and slow consumer demand - all of which weigh on oil consumption. The net result is usually bearish for crude.

What role does OPEC+ play?

OPEC+ remains a key player in balancing the market, but its restraint has been limited. While the group is adding supplies more slowly than some expected, it is still releasing barrels into an already well-supplied market. Their strategy suggests a preference for defending market share rather than aggressively cutting output to prop up prices.

Contents