Nvidia’s AI power play: What the market is really pricing in

December 12, 2025
A glossy, metallic rendering of an NVIDIA-style eye logo placed on a digital circuit-board background with glowing network nodes.

Nvidia has become the gravitational centre of the AI economy, influencing everything from chip supply to geopolitics. Its latest quarter underscored the scale of that dominance, with revenue reaching $57 billion and data center sales rising 66% year-over-year. Yet the story surrounding the stock has widened beyond earnings beats and supply shortages.

Regulators, global politics, and renewed competition for AI infrastructure contracts now shape investor expectations as much as product cycles. Nvidia’s near-term outlook hinges on whether demand can stay ahead of the tightening web of export rules and rising capital expenditure from rivals.

What’s driving Nvidia’s momentum?

A rush of global AI spending continues to propel Nvidia’s growth. The company described its cloud partners as “sold out,” signalling another year where supply may struggle to meet demand. Market researchers expect the AI chip industry to reach $286 billion by 2026, up from $207 billion in 2025 . That tight supply environment strengthens Nvidia’s pricing power and reinforces its role as the hardware gatekeeper for generative AI.

Geopolitics, rather than technology alone, is adding new layers to the narrative. President Trump’s approval for Nvidia to export H200 chips to selected Chinese customers reopened a revenue stream that had dwindled under earlier restrictions. 

The catch is a 25% revenue-sharing requirement with the U.S. government, far higher than the previous 15% fee applied to the weaker H20 accelerator. The compromise grants Nvidia partial access to a once-critical market, but only under terms designed to remind investors that the regulatory backdrop is anything but settled.

Why it matters

China once accounted for around a quarter of Nvidia’s revenue, so any pathway back into the region carries strategic weight. Analysts note that current financial forecasts assume almost no meaningful contribution from China, meaning H200 shipments could provide upside rather than patching a hole. The revenue-sharing fee, however, eats into margins and underscores how political clearance can come at a price. It also raises a legal debate about whether such arrangements constitute export taxes.

Some fund managers see the mixed signals around China as part of a broader recalibration. Morgan Stanley recently raised its target to $250, arguing fears of market-share erosion are overstated and that Nvidia remains the “AI hardware king.” Their commentary captures a wider sentiment: the bottleneck for AI compute still runs through Nvidia’s supply chain. Any sign of loosening in tight markets - even partial - can ripple through the sector’s valuation models.

Impact on the tech market

The export decision triggered immediate interest from ByteDance and Alibaba, which reportedly want large allocations of the newly approved H200 chips. Their enthusiasm illustrates China’s hunger for higher-performance computing after months of relying on the far weaker H20. At the same time, Beijing’s caution about foreign chips and Nvidia’s limited H200 output creates uncertainty. Investors interpret China as a volatile bonus opportunity rather than a dependable growth pillar.

Meanwhile, Nvidia’s own technology roadmap is expanding the competitive moat. Its upcoming Blackwell and Rubin chips sit at the centre of what management describes as “visibility to a half-trillion dollars” in future AI revenue. The company has also rolled out location-verification software to curb chip smuggling - a pre-emptive effort to stay ahead of regulators after reports of grey-market attempts to move $160 million worth of hardware into China. Such tools may cool demand in sensitive jurisdictions but strengthen Nvidia’s credibility as a compliant supplier.

The wider tech sector continues to be pulled into Nvidia’s orbit. Oracle’s stock sell-off - down 11% after reporting weaker revenue despite heavy AI spending - dragged Nvidia and other AI names lower on the day. The episode revealed how tightly investor sentiment is now wired to any signal about the AI capex cycle, particularly from companies competing for the same infrastructure contracts. Market reactions show that Nvidia may hold sector-leading fundamentals, but it does not operate in isolation.

Expert outlook

Analysts remain overwhelmingly bullish despite the regulatory twists. Across major platforms, average 12-month price targets range from $248 to $258, implying a roughly 30–40% upside from recent levels. Evercore ISI and Cantor Fitzgerald see scope for the stock to clear $300 in 2026 if AI infrastructure spending maintains its current trajectory. Their assumptions hinge on Nvidia continuing to monopolise high-end accelerator demand, with free cash flow possibly exceeding $100 billion a year within two years.

Longer-term projections stretch into far more ambitious territory. Some multi-year models imagine Nvidia approaching a $20 trillion market cap by 2030, depending on how quickly the world scales AI computing. These scenarios rely on a future where data centre expansion, autonomous systems, and edge AI form a continuous upgrade cycle rather than a peak-and-plateau dynamic. The biggest unknown is geopolitical stability: new export rules or supply-chain constraints could slow the cycle just as effectively as falling demand.

Key takeaway

Nvidia remains the indispensable engine of the AI boom, even as politics and export rules tighten around it. Strong demand, record earnings, and an unmatched product pipeline continue to outweigh the risks. The reopening of China - partial and costly as it is - adds an unexpected layer of upside to the story. The next signals to watch will be Blackwell’s rollout, regulatory shifts in Washington and Beijing, and whether cloud providers remain capacity-constrained through 2026.

Nvidia technical insights

NVIDIA is stabilising above the $175 support level after a weeks-long pullback, with the Bollinger Bands beginning to narrow as price consolidates. The RSI is rising gradually from the midline, signalling a mild improvement in momentum, but not yet enough to confirm a bullish reversal. 

Upside attempts face resistance at $196 and $207, where previous rallies have triggered profit-taking. A break below $175 would risk fresh liquidations, while sustained closes above $196 would be the first sign that buyers are regaining control.

NVIDIA daily chart with Bollinger Bands, support and resistance levels, and RSI rising slowly near the midline
Source: Deriv MT5

The performance figures quoted are not a guarantee of future performance.

FAQs

Why did the U.S. approve Nvidia’s H200 chip exports to China?

The government authorised sales to selected Chinese clients as part of a political compromise, requiring Nvidia to hand over 25% of revenue from those transactions. It restores partial access to a critical market while maintaining national-security limits on Blackwell-class chips.

Will the 25% revenue fee hurt Nvidia’s profitability?

It reduces margins on Chinese H200 shipments, particularly in comparison to global sales. Nvidia’s financial guidance does not currently rely on China revenue, so the impact is additive but constrained. Investors see it as upside with strings attached.

Why are Chinese firms seeking H200 chips so quickly?

ByteDance and Alibaba want higher-performance accelerators after months of relying on weaker alternatives. The H200 is almost six times more powerful than the previously allowed H20, making it more suitable for large-scale AI training. Beijing may still review orders for political reasons.

How strong is Nvidia’s core AI demand?

Exceptionally strong. Nvidia reported $51.2 billion in data centre revenue last quarter, up 66% year on year, with management saying “the clouds are sold out.” Analysts cite this as evidence that the AI infrastructure cycle still has runway.

Is Nvidia at risk from increased regulation?

Yes, but it is also adapting quickly by deploying location-verification software and working closely with regulators. These measures help mitigate future smuggling incidents and maintain access to global markets, though they may raise concerns in countries wary of U.S. oversight.

Contents